On April 10 Peter Del Tredici, from the Arnold Arboretum, spoke at MetroHort on Wild Urban Plants. I think he’s on to something.
The gist of his lecture is that urban environments create horticultural conditions (disturbed, compacted soils, expanses of pavement, urban heat island warming, etc.) that support a distinct community of plants. Cosmopolitan in origin, these plants are largely reviled as weeds: ailanthus, black locust, mugwort, bindweed, chicory. We struggle to eradicate them; even legislate against them. Instead we might recognize their possibilities for the ruderal landscape.
(Learning the word “ruderal” was worth the trip up there: “growing in rubbish, poor land, or waste places. From Latin rudera, ruins, rubbish, plural of rudus, broken stone.”)
Del Tredici is working on a book, Wild Urban Plants. It goes to the publisher in October. It sounds like Weeds of the Northeast, horticulturally considered. I look forward to seeing it.
There is a lot wishful thinking about native plants: You can earn a LEED credit by planting a community of natives on imported soil and handing it over to the maintenance man to nurse. I don’t want to discourage well-meaning gestures, but it’s hard to see how this kind of planting accomplishes much in the way of plant conservation. (What is actually needed is a whole preserved ecosystem where the plants can endure in a community of organisms they evolved with – something beyond the purview of green building.)
For urban planting we might look instead to these ruderal “natives” that are so well suited to the actual growing conditions. Del Tredici has planted meadows of yarrow, chicory, goldenrod, and bouncing bet. And the black locust is as fine a tree as grows.
I’d be interested to know if the planting schemes for the High Line consider this line of thinking. Ruderal natives are growing there already.